Modern Dystopia

Tag Archive: rant

Ouya – or how to break Kickstarter

It has been a long time since I felt the need to get on my soapbox and post to my Modern Dystopia blog. Life is pretty good and I haventhad anything to complain about. Not that a blog should only be for complaining, but sometimes you just need to get things off your chest.

A while back I helped fund a Kickstarter project for a little gaming console called Ouya. It’s certainly not the first project I have backed, on Kickstarter or other crowd funding sites, but it is one that has been the biggest regret. You see crowd funding is a fresh and in my eyes, a wonderful concept. A new paradigm for how the consumer interacts with designers, ideas people and other creative types. It’s a way to bring into being someone’s dreams and to produce art or products that may never have otherwise seen the light of day. I’m very proud to have backed around 60 projects!  That’s right, I’ve been a bit of a philanthropist and I’ve really loved seeing what has come of this generosity.

So that brings us to Ouya. It was the bright light of Kickstarter. Where previously games had excelled, now an actual console was being offered, and lots of big promises were being made. So I jumped right in on the ground floor and put my money towards the project. It didn’t need my money though, a huge number of people backed Ouya to the tune of over 8 million dollars. But did we really do our due diligence? Did we read between the lines? Why were so many people eager to fork out the cash for what always was going to be a below par console with capabilities already matched in most of homes?

Well a few commentators seem to have had the foresight and wisdom to see what might be coming. Chris over at Theorycraft wrote an article “Why The Ouya will Flop“. In hindsight I wish I had seen and read that article before promising my money. Another article over at Eurogamer also sounded some alarm bells. Again I didn’t read the article which was title ‘The Trouble with Ouya“.

Yesterday morning my Ouya arrived. Like most over people who backed the Kickstarter my Ouya arrived very late, in itself that wouldn’t be an issue. Kickstarter is not a store, it’s crowdfunding, and with any sort of funding there are risks and no promises. Except the team at Ouya (Which for all we know is Julie Uhrman sitting by herself in a rented office somewhere) kept making promises, they kept making misleading statements, and they kept saying we’d be getting our Ouya and it would be amazing. Well it certainly isn’t. It’s probably one of the worst PR disasters I’ve seen in the tech world, and EA are pretty good at PR messes.  Kickstarter updates said everything was good and on track, they said our consoles had been shipped, but it was what they weren’t saying that pissed everyone off.

Ouya didn’t tell us that ‘shipped’ meant they’d simply done from factory to a shipping company. The consoles weren’t actually in transit, they were missing. Tracking numbers were sent out eventually, but with no tracking links. The company listed as the shipping company didn’t actually have the consoles. My console was delivered by Australia Post eventually, not by DHL whose name was mentioned in my email, and the tracking number supposedly matched the format of some other company altogether.

I wasn’t the only one, and almost 30,000 .. yes that’s right 30,000!! comments on the Kickstarter page were going unanswered and being brushed of with friendly, but canned responses. I myself emailed support and had no response until I started speaking out on Twitter and other public forums. When I did get a response it was just boilerplate, and that was proven when I replied and got the same response sent right back. I figured out what had happened, I’m not silly, they palmed off the distribution to a third party and moved on to do other things. Like camp outside E3 like beggars, making fools of themselves in front of the whole world. These sorts of stunts are just that, stunts, and they don’t a reputable company make.

My Ouya arrived. Out of the blue. Luckily I was home because it wasn’t a receipted delivery so the Aust. Post guy could have just left it on my doorstep. I opened the box with mixed expectations. On one hand Ouya had presented itself as a modern, hip company, but I’d also started hearing mixed news on the unboxing. Immediately I opened the box though I knew the Ouya was a joke. It was like getting something from a dodgy chinese online store with no name electronics. The outer box was twice as big as it needed to be. The extra controller I had bought was banging around loosely with only a scrap of bubble wrap giving a vague nod in the direction of protection. Some AA batteries had been dropped in as well.

The Ouya box itself looked OK, a nice matt charcoal colour. Unboxing revealed another cheap looking controller and the Ouya cube. But pulling these out the rest of the package was just a pile of cables and bits dumped in the box. The cheapest of the cheap, that’s what it looked and felt like. I’ll post pictures below, you can see the unboxing for yourself. That way you don’t have to buy one, I’d hate for anyone else to be this disappointed!



Anyway, moving on. Plugging it in and setting it up was a breeze. That was a positive experience, but it was the only one. The minimalist approach is nice looking, but lacks interface cues and standards that we’ve come to expect. Entering text is tedious and unwieldy due to the awful controllers. The D pad cant even move left and right consistently. There is no text prediction and the menus are vague in their meaning.

I downloaded a few games from the miserable selection. Most games looked like they came straight out of 1993 and if I wanted Demos I could get more and better demos in the Playstation store. The whole ‘free games’ thing is a joke. It’s like the entire business model is based around offering the equivalent of ‘shareware’ demos. I wasn’t even able to play some of the games I downloaded because the controls didn’t work. That’s right, out of the box the controllers shoulder buttons were non functional. With no way that I could see to remap buttons this rendered my experience an almost complete loss on day one.

I did play you Don’t Know Jack. However I can play that on anything, and at least on other devices I diont have to put up with controller buttons that get stuck down every second button press. Seriously, I paid MONEY for this thing???

OK. Rant over. I’m really sorry that a project like this, with such a huge number of backers may have soured 30,000+ people towards future Kickstarter projects. if you backed Ouya I suggest you treat it as an isolated case. Of course use due diligence with any project you may want to support, but on the whole Kickstarter is a fun place full of great ideas. Some may not pan out as well as hoped, some may fail or not live up to expectations, but they are people trying to do things just a little bit differently, and that should always be encouraged.



Woolworths Bullshit!

If you’re not aware of this already, Woolworths have stopped accepting credit/debit cards (such as Visa and Mastercard debit cards) for credit transactions at their EFTPOS terminals. Instead you will be required to make a Cheque or Savings choice, and hence, with most banks, incur a fee yourself for the privilege. The theory is that they don’t want to cop the fees from credit transactions, but they’re quite happy for you to use a CREDIT card.

I heard about this a little while back, and listened to a Woolworths spokesperson make some very conflicting statements.

1) They claimed that use of Debit cards was becoming an unmanageable cost due to their rising prevalence in transactions and the fact that they get charged a percentage fee by the bank for credit card transactions.

2) They said it would only impact a VERY SMALL number of consumers as less than 1% of their customer base actually use this method.

So which is it? If it’s only 1% then how do the other 99% pay?

I am sure actual credit card usage (as opposed to debit cards using the credit option) is much higher than 1%, but they aren’t stopping you using them. Imagine the furore if they stopped accepting credit cards! or if they did (as they have a right to) charge a small fee for credit transactions.

They’d be publicly shamed on every current affairs show in the country, and every reputable media outlet too! Instead, they’re shafting the little man. The lower income people who are probably trying very hard to AVOID credit cards as the evil trap that they are.

My bank makes a POINT of promoting these debit cards as a way to avoid fees. The fees to use them as EFTPOS are quite high, whereas credit transactions are fee free. Using the credit option allows them to recoup a small amount in fees from the retailer, in the same way every other credit transaction does. Those costs are BUILT IN to the costs at the supermarket. We’re not inventing a new expense for Woolworths.

Now… I’m having a rant, but I’ll mention another thing. I’m not sure if or how this applies, but doesn’t Australian law say that you cant artificially limit payment options in this way? Didn’t Ebay have to do an about face when they tried to limit the options for making payment?

I’m looking forward to leaving a few hundred dollars of groceries on the checkout when they refuse to allow a credit transaction.

Don’t boycott them. Make a public statement, in teh store, so the managers have to explain to their bosses what’s happening at the checkout.

Fill your trolley, and then refuse to pay by any means other than credit! If they wont accept your payment, walk out and go to Coles, or IGA.

It’s my shopping night tomorrow. I’ll be putting them through the wringer.

You can write to Woolworths here:

Mandatory Internet Censorship

It’s important that you make your voice heard on the subject of Mandatory Internet Censorship. However, in this modern age our government is yet to introduce guidelines or facilities for the lodging of electronic petitions, even though a house committee has been looking at it for at least 4 years now.

So if you want your voice to be heard read on, and this is true for all petitions to the federal government! Whether it’s about No Clean Feed, R18+ Gaming or any other subject.

Why signing the official paper petition against internet censorship is the only sure way to make your signature count!

The House of Representatives is the house in Australian Parliament that will be passing the legislation to filter the internet, This House can only be petitioned on paper and each signature must be in the persons own signature, online petitions are not valid, when petitioning parliament you must petition the appropriate house on an issue in which they have the power to act, and only the House of Representatives have the power to act on this bill that imposes mandatory filtering of the internet.

Please take 5 minutes to print out this pre-approved official petition, that is going to be tabled in Parliament in 6 weeks, it’s great if you have already signed a digital one, however it does not take the place of the official paper petition.

Official Paper Petition against internet censorship at any of the below addresses:;;;

Please share this information around, so we can show parliament how serious we are about opposing censorship.

PornStarNames invade Twitter

I’m not surprised really, Twitter is, after all a perfect medium for a meme like this. But the name game isn’t a new one, hell I think I remember first figuring out my Porn Star Name when I was in early high school, a long long time before the internet existed as we know it.

But now…wow! Paranoia is brought to new levels. Warnings abound now on Twitter about how revealing your PornStarName is akin to giving those nasty hackers/crackers/russian mafia you credit card number and PIN. Well, get over it. A couple of things to think about…

1) I’ve never seen Street names used as security questions in over 17yrs online IT work. Occasionally pet names, yes but think about it…

2) If you DO use these things as passwords, security answers, then you’d be pretty damn stupid to start typing them out anywhere, I hate to say people deserve to have ID stolen, but if you’re going to be that daft, then maybe you do.

I think someone mentioned something about mother’s maiden name being aprt of the game, and if someone’s trying to slip that in, then yes, I’d be a bit more concerned. It was never part of the game, and may be an obvious attempt at social engineering, but again, you wouldn’t be that stupid in the first place would you. I mean, does anyone actually USE their mother’s maiden name as a security question answer? It’s probably one of the least secure items you could use to start with, easily discovered by any really interested person.

PornStarNames is a laugh itss been doing the rounds since long before the internet, just because it made it to Twitter, no need to think it’s some great social engineering scam, it’s not.

Have a laugh, at your own expense and others, and if you have, foolishly, used any of this information as a password or security question somewhere, then surely you’ll see those letters appear on the screen before you and know it’s not a good idea to share.

Face Value

I’m sitting here, reading a few posts, exchanging emails, just wasting a few moments as you do and I’ve been inspired to write a little something on how often we do, or don’t take things at face value.

two seperate cases:

First, there is the story that’s doing the rounds atthe moment about a Redback Spider catching a small snake. i first saw it here and then it came through on the usual email chain letter train. I even reposted the link on my facebook account, figured it was pretty interesting. But I took it on “face value” and didn’t think to question the veracity of the story. However someone else did and I soon got an email from a friend, ‘it’s not a Red Back, it’s a Black Widow, and therefore American” (I’m paraphrasing BTW)

That made me think, “what’s the difference?”

So I went looking, first I followed the original blog story back to it’s source, and unfortunately it didn’t go too far and seeemd to be an unacknowledged repost even then. I read other peoples comments on the stories, and came up with a couple of things that could be checked. The type of Snake, and the type of spider. Someone mentioned the possibility that it was a South African snake, an Aurora House Snake so I checked out both the snake and the spider. The spider, it’s a tough call, could be A Redback, a Black Widow, a Button Spider, or one of many variants on the genus Latrodectus. The snake though, note that distinctive orange strip seen clearly in the picture below…

Spider Eats Snake

So a bit of research, and a story, that on ‘face value’ seems legit, is suddenly quite probably not an Australian story at all, and the spider is in all likely hood not a Redback, but another similar spider of that genus.

but what of the other side of the coin, the inability of some to talke something at ‘face value’.

This is my second point. Even in the comments for this spider story I saw people write “It’s a fake, it’s a photoshop”. If yuo surf/stuble about the web as much as I do you’ll notice it seems to be the catch cry of a jaded generation. So used to things being faked, they can’t accept occasionally that marvelous things can and will be caught on camera. That nature is often more beautiful, or more spectacular than one could ever imagine.

Sometimes you do just have to enjoy the image beforeyou, take it as you see and, and not cry ‘photoshop!” just because you’ve never seen soemthing like it before. hell it doesn’t have to be nature that’s weird…. tell me what you think of this. yes, it’s a crap post, but yet the ONLY comment asks… “photshopped?” I mean come on. A dodgy photo taken on a wet day of some idiot’s stupid car, why the f*** would anyone BOTHER! (of course you could say the same about the car in the photo.)

Anyway, to all you who cry “photoshop!” take a moment to enjoy things at face value. open your eyes to the world a bit. and if a photo is a clever photoshop fake, applaud the clever SOB who pulled it off.